|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: Gov. Scott: 'Ban Specific People From Having Weapons'
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Refusing to "infringe" on Second Amendment rights and stopping short of "banning specific weapons," Gov. Rick Scott, R-Fla., is working to pass some gun control legislation in his state – because "I'm a dad." "I'm going to do what I can to make sure guns are not in the hands of the wrong people," Scott told "Fox News Sunday." "If you have mental illness you shouldn't have a gun. If you've threatened yourself or threaten others, you shouldn't have a gun.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/26/2018)
|
I like Rick Scott and he's been a good governor. I voted for him twice. But I think he's wrong on this issue. Beefing up methods that so far have proven to be ineffective gives new life to Einstein's view, "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
Arming and training personnel in schools is the only thing that will be effective on the ground, yet it is reflexively dismissed out-of-hand.
People need to get off their irrational prejudices and get it done. |
| Comment by:
jac
(2/26/2018)
|
| Maybe a ban on liberal gun banners owing weapons would be a good idea because they are too stupid to be trusted with firearms. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
