|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Texas Governor Signs 7-Pack of Pro-Gun Bills
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott signed a full schedule of Second Amendment reforms into law last week while at the Alamo. The seven bills included measures to bring permitless carry to the Lone Star State, make Texas a Second Amendment Sanctuary State, prohibit the state government from closing firearm-related businesses during emergencies and prevents “woke” corporations who receive taxpayer dollars from discriminating against the firearms industry.
|
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(6/21/2021)
|
| Texas is almost perfect and just needs to end the state ban on freed felons owning guns, ban registration by banning use of the 4473 and retaining records of approved sales, and ban confiscation for mere restraining orders that are widely abused and handed out from ex parte meetings and with no evidence. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
