|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(7/11/2016)
|
Whoever wrote this article has it backwards. The suspects were the robbers and the victim is the home owner.
Another example of biased reporting by a gun hating liberal of which Maryland has a surplus.. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/11/2016)
|
Take it easy, jac.
The mistake is in the poster's synopsis, which is not, repeat NOT from the published story.
The article only refers to him as a man taken into custody, and makes clear that so far the evidence indicates that the shooting was justified.
Follow the link and see. |
| Comment by:
jac
(7/11/2016)
|
Quote from the article.
"He said evidence is supporting witness statements and it appears the two victims were shot in the house as they tried to enter through the front door." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
