|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Tom Brokaw: More Legal Guns Will Mean More 'Homegrown Terrorism'
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Imagine you've just worked (and probably partied) your tail off for a few years. You've been given a slip of paper that says you're smart, and you're ready to enter "the real world." Sure, these days that means you're probably moving back home to live with your parents but you're hopeful and eager nonetheless. It's time to get out there and do ....whatever it is you're going to do. But first, you get to spend part of your big graduation day listening to some left-wing figurehead as they prattle on about how exercising your rights will lead to more homegrown terrorism. |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(5/24/2016)
|
Translation: More individual liberty will mean more 'homegrown terrorism'.
What an idiot.
Equivalent to Chris Cuomo's traitorous statement, "Rights don't come from God, they come from men."
We have arrived at the point where progressives don't even conceal what they truly believe anymore.
They are unabashedly under-American. |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(5/24/2016)
|
| (Damn spell-checker.) |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(5/26/2016)
|
| Members of the Propaganda Corps are going to lay scattered in large numbers across the coming battlefield. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
