|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
IL: Illinois voters support gun dealers getting licensed by state
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A national gun violence prevention organization claimed this week that 85 percent of Illinois voters support legislation to require gun dealers to obtain a state license to sell firearms.
The organization called Americans for Responsible Solutions recently surveyed Illinois voters about legislation proposed in Springfield called the Gun Dealer Licensing Act aimed at requiring firearm dealers register with the Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, and the results were in favor of the proposal by overwhelming amounts. Of the voters asked downstate, 77 percent said they would support the measure, according to the study. Illinois gun owners supported the measure by 77 percent as well, according to the findings. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(5/26/2016)
|
| 77 percent of Illinois voters don't know about federal licensing requirements in effect since 1968... |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
