|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: Democratic Rep: ‘My First Amendment Right Is Different From Yours’
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The exchange started when Demings wrote on Facebook that she supports "common sense gun legislation" and "stand[s] against the gun lobby."
Hours later, a Facebook user referenced an incident from February 2009, when Demings served as the chief of police in Orlando, Fla. Someone broke into Demings' vehicle at the time and stole her agency-issued 9 mm Sig Sauer gun, ammunition, handcuffs, and baton. An internal-affairs investigator subsequently gave Demings a "written censure" for not properly securing her firearm in her car. |
| Comment by:
jac
(5/17/2017)
|
Liberal democrats actually believe that if you don't agree with them that you are not entitled to have an opinion.
It doesn't matter that their opinion is entirely based on emotions as opposed to actual facts. People are killed by guns. Therefore, they are bad.
It doesn't matter that they are also used to protect people's lives.
I would hate to have to go without the protection afforded by my guns. I am 68 years old and not capable of fighting off a young thug. The only thing that keeps me safe is access to a gun.
And don't tell me that the authorities will protect you. They don't do a very good job protecting all the people robbed, injured and killed by violent criminals every day. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
