data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdd48/fdd487ee41c9eeffc3a8053b937721c590360eee" alt="Keep and Bear Arms"
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: The danger of Second Amendment sanctuaries
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
On May 11, Charlotte County commissioners declared Charlotte County a “Second Amendment sanctuary” that purports to hinder or prevent the enforcement of certain gun safety laws. Similar resolutions have passed in other counties in Florida and around the country.
Proponents of these resolutions pronounce any gun-control legislation as unconstitutional, whether it requires background checks or a waiting period, bans bump-stock devices that allow for rapid fire, or outlaws assault-style rifles. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/20/2021)
|
The usual pap - "gun safety" and "commonsense gun safety laws."
She seems astonished that anybody would question the government's authority to, in our "best interest," spindle/fold/mutilate black-letter proscriptions on its power.
People like her can't understand that; it isn't in their wheelhouse. It's best to pat them on the head like a 3yr-old and just walk on by. Curtailing certain constitutional liberties makes "sense," and inventing liberty that doesn't exist makes "sense" to them as well.
Waddaya gonna do? |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)] |
|
|