|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/9/2015)
|
| What happens when actual men everywhere say "F***** GQ for promoting impotence"? |
| Comment by:
wcgray_va@yahoo.com
(10/9/2015)
|
| The complaint is that Carson was criticizing the victims in Oregon. When the Jewish Defense League says "Never Again!" are they criticizing the murdered Jews during WWII? A book titled "They Fought Back" gathered stories of Jewish resistance during WWII and was not a criticism of the murder victims. Solzenetzin (sp ?) wrote how the prisoners in Stalin's gulags criticized themselves for not resisting the secret police en masse. He thought that might have cut short the mass arrests if the police did not feel safe. Who had more right to criticize than the prisoners themselves? We congratulate the brave citizens who took down the gunman on that train in France. Are we criticizing all the other passengers who did not participate? No. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
