|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Why You Should Return the (wrong) Gun You Got for Christmas
Submitted by:
Rob Morse
Website: slowfacts.wordpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Christmas is coming. Our friends mean well, but lots of Christmas gifts don’t fit. I have several sweaters that are the wrong color and wrong size. Like a sweater, your firearm has to fit you, so don’t be shy about returning the firearm you received for Christmas if it isn’t the right one for you. A firearm is as personal as a pair of shoes. Finding the right pair is hard to do. We can be partially to blame.
People often give us the gun they wish we needed, rather than the gun that best fits our needs today. We do that to ourselves as well. We tell ourselves we’ll grow into that pistol.. someday. Fortunately, there are enough choices out there that we can probably find something what suits us today.
Where should we start? |
| Comment by:
laker1
(12/14/2016)
|
| No need to return it. Good guns are an investment and an equity storage at the very least. They have no expiration date. They can and do appreciate over time as new gun prices increase. They store easily with little care. In addition a gun can save your life. Compare these facts to anything else you own in your house or garage. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
