|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WI: State Debate: Rep. Bob Gannon's 'Gun Bill' Decried
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Political Heat blogger Chris Walker contends that state Rep. Bob Gannon's gun view relies on the doctrine of "mutual assured destruction." What Gannon and others who think like him are trying to do, Walker asserts, is to shift the blame of gun violence away from guns and onto business people who don't want guns in their establishment. His reasoning isn't rational, the blogger says. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(6/27/2016)
|
http://patch.com/oregon/portland/woman-kills-intruder-childs-bedroom
Intruder Killed While in Child's Bedroom Identified as Gresham Man
David McCrary was shot and killed by Tara-Alexis Ford when she came home and found him in her daughter's room.
Portland, OR
By Colin Miner (Patch Staff) - June 27, 2016 6:17 pm ET
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
