|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
AL: Want to buy a handgun? Lawmaker wants you to be 21, have a permit first
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"There has been a flurry of gun control measures coming out of Congress. The most recent targets handgun sales."
"Let's talk about that."
"What's the proposal?"
"Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Maryland, and three Connecticut lawmakers have introduced the Handgun Purchasers Licensing Act. The act would require people to obtain a license to purchase a handgun, something that's currently not required in Alabama. Rifles and other types of firearms would be exempt from the regulations."
"Specifically...."
"The act would establish a grant program through the Department of Justice that would encourage states to establish permit-to-purchase requirements for all handguns. ..." ... |
| Comment by:
lostone1413
(6/16/2015)
|
| Coming from the same Government that sees nothing wrong in letting BATF arm the gangs and drug cartels |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
