
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
VA: Can we lock down guns instead of schools?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A few teachers and I just spent more than a half hour cooped up in a dark room with a bunch of students. Shushing the kids, keeping them quiet. What kind of class was this, you might reasonably wonder. A dark room? Silence? (Can elucidation—to have something ‘made light’—even take place in darkness?) What exactly was transpiring in this room devoid of students questioning or teachers explaining—a room where, except for the occasional giggle or sigh of impatience, everyone was deadly silent? It was a lockdown drill. |
Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/21/2015)
|
Sounds like a "failure to communicate" to me. Don't know about y'all but I had to deal with "Duck and Cover" drills as a school-age youngster. And for far less logical reasons ! Kids are adaptable if presented with reasons why they're doing what's asked of them. If there's any "failure" in this concept it lies with the school administrations and teachers. Childhood is dangerous. Children have an innate drive to explore their world. Parents need to learn/accept their children learn more by "doing" than by "seeing" or "reading". Doing provides direct tactile feedback and stimuli well-suited to short attention spans. Caring parents need to encourage exploration, but strive to forsee and advert its more lethal consequences. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|