|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
laker1
(12/13/2016)
|
| It won't be used to defend kids in school either. How about destroying several cars that may be used in drunk driving homicides or armed robberies? |
| Comment by:
usav8er
(12/13/2016)
|
| The illogical mind of a liberal. He could have sold that rifle and used the money to help a homeless family, or fed the hungry, or a dozen other worthwhile causes. Destroying the rifle benefited no one. |
| Comment by:
jac
(12/13/2016)
|
| Absolute stupidity. They could have sold it and donated the money to a worthwhile cause. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)] |
|
|
