|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
SC: Gun Groups React to President's Speech
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
After President Barack Obama's speech calling for stricter gun control on Tuesday, local groups are reacting.
"So many times we say that, well if it just saves one child, it's good for it," said Grassroots GunRights S.C. President, Ed Kelleher. "But we don't count the upside to firearms ownership." |
Comment by:
laker1
(1/6/2016)
|
No way could Obama pass a FBI background check to handle classified information let alone the nuclear option. His past association with domestic terrorists Ayers and wife, Communist Van Jones, his left wing New Party in college and bogus personal documents prohibit it. |
Comment by:
gariders
(1/6/2016)
|
This from the same political party that supports abortion even into the third trimester. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|