|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/27/2016)
|
| And they base this conclusion on their careful study of all the violence at University of Utah, right? Um, right? Um, Bueller? |
| Comment by:
jac
(10/27/2016)
|
What would one expect out of a Maryland institution? Seeing as how Maryland has no concealed carry reciprocity and issues very few carry permits, John Hopkins is not affected by legal concealed carry on campus so they should just stay out of this conversation.
No doubt, they already have concealed carry on campus, but not by law abiding citizens.
In actuality, legal concealed carry on college campuses has not been a problem anywhere, in spite of the "sky is falling" critics. John Hopkins should worry about real problems like rape and assault on campus and out of control crime and murders in Baltimore. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
