|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(10/27/2015)
|
Just maybe, 5 percent of the gun stores are selling the majority of guns used in crimes because they are located in or near the hood where the hoodlums live.
The home boys aren't going to drive 20 miles when they can buy a gun within walking distance or a bus ride.
Close down those 5 percent of the gun retailers, and the next closest stores will be supplying 90 percent of the crime guns.
This is not a "common sense" gun control measure. This is just another attack on gun retailers and owners. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/27/2015)
|
| She is a Democrat, therefore she is a STINGKER. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
