|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
So The NRA Sends a Questionnaire To a Seattle State Senator
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
When the National Rifle Association (NRA) sent out its latest legislative questionnaire, Reuven Carlyle had a choice response ready. Carlyle, a Democratic state senator from Seattle, received a list of questions Friday, used to determine how friendly lawmakers are to gun rights. If you choose not to return a questionnaire, you may be assigned a ? rating, which can be interpreted by our membership as indifference, if not outright hostility, toward Second Amendment-related issues, the NRAs email reads. |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(5/31/2016)
|
Even if they fill out the questionnaire, the responses maybe false. Back in 2008 when Mark Begich was running for US Senator for Alaska, he was diagnosed with sudden onset of NRA Life membership after being a very anti-gun rights mayor of skAnchorage and violating state law twice in opposition to AK's Constitutional Carry.
Someone on his campaign was smart enough to give the "right answers" to the questionnaire and the NRA gave him an "A" rating without even looking at his past anti-gun record. Fortunately that little **** weasel was defeated after his first term due to his Obamacare vote hopefully he disappears into obscurity.......or an avalanche. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
