|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Elizabeth Warren’s Hearing Aid Cronyism
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
“There’s a pretty good chance that these hunting devices would fall within Warren’s definition of ‘over-the-counter hearing aid,’” wrote Erich Pratt, executive director of the group, “which would mean that a new federal bureaucracy would be in charge of regulating hunting. Were Warren less of an enemy of the Second Amendment, we might give more credibility to the argument that we were protected by the ‘perceived … hearing impairment’ language of the Warren bill. But she isn’t. So we don’t.” |
| Comment by:
-none-
(5/19/2017)
|
| (Italian female) "Do you know that in Italy the government introduced the crime of excessive legitimate defense? It means that even the police have to be careful not to shoot criminals, otherwise they can be tried and even be forced to pay the "victims" for damages. Citizens are fed up with all this good-doing attitude which comes from the fourth non-elected left government. Two weeks ago an amendation was approved in order to keep us calm: you can defend yourself against burglars, but only at night!!!!! However it's up to the judge to decide whether you've been excessively rash while pulling the trigger... This is bordering on the ridiculous! So, can you imagine what could happen if only someone talked about teaching self-defense to women? |
| Comment by:
-none-
(5/19/2017)
|
| "You are definitely right, but here in Italy we have to cope with a brainless government supporting illegal immigration and taking our rights away..."" |
| Comment by:
-none-
(5/19/2017)
|
| "I agree with your sentiment, but many English whites are cucked, and not all, but certainly not enough to put up a decent resistance, considering that they are as defenseless as cat toys. It would be different if England allowed their citizens to carry firearms. I think, in the near future, that either the Windsors will be pressured to convert to Islam, or forced to step aside and renounce the crown." |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/19/2017)
|
Yo, -none-
Are you on this planet?
What does Brit gun control have to do with American gov't interference in the hearing aid market? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|
