|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
AR: Won't Apologize for 'Passion and Emotion,' Flowers Says; Senators Against Reprimand
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Arkansas Sen. Stephanie Flowers, D-Pine Bluff, on Monday told lawmakers that she won't apologize for a passionate argument she made against a "stand your ground" self-defense bill last week. Her remarks came after video of the speech went viral over the weekend. A clip of Flowers chastising a Senate Judiciary Committee and refusing to stop speaking was viewed millions of times online and shared by politicians, gun control advocates and celebrities. In the video, Flowers argues that "stand your ground" laws in other states have taken a violent toll on black communities.
|
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(3/12/2019)
|
Politicians like Flowers don't need to apologize, they don't need to be reprimanded ....
THEY NEED TO BE TURNED OUT OF OFFICE!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
