|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/28/2016)
|
| Baloney. |
| Comment by:
lbauer
(1/28/2016)
|
| About such studies, what they always fail to mention is that most times a gun is used to harm someone in a household the shooting is connected with criminal activity. The chance of a family member being harmed by a legally owned firearm absent a criminal act is extremely slight. But then the only way the anti gunners can gain support is to cherry pick their statistics. |
| Comment by:
hisself
(1/28/2016)
|
Funny how they can award a Nobel prize to an idiot!
He is in good company with obama, however. |
| Comment by:
hisself
(1/28/2016)
|
Funny how they can award a Nobel prize to an idiot!
He is in good company with obama, however. |
| Comment by:
jac
(1/28/2016)
|
They come up with this bogus statistic by including suicide in their data and ignoring defensive firearm use where no one is killed.
I am 67 years old and we have always had guns in the house. Nobody was ever harmed. I'll take my chances as the risk of a negligent shooting is less than nil. |
| Comment by:
dalel
(1/29/2016)
|
| Liberals telling me these same tired old lies, are much more dangerous to my family than any firearm I may possess. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
