Keep and Bear Arms - Gun Owners Home Page

NOTE! This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or any other living person besides the one who posted them. Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion Policy, but there's a bad apple in every bunch, and we have no control over bigots and other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com

The Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:

Second Amendment Not a License to Kill
Submitted by: John C
Website: https://www.facebook.com/2ndAmendmentUSA/

There are 4 comments on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments

However, I want the pro-gun community to understand that there is a group of us who needs to be confronted and corrected or disavowed. I have been using the term "Second Amendment absolutists" to describe them in previous discussion for quite a few years. An abolutist[sic] thinks the Second Amendment allows anyone to own any gun at any time and at any location they choose.

Ed.: It isn't often that an anti-gunner submits their own anti-gun screed here.

Comment by: dasing (4/28/2017)

That is exactly what 2A means!

Comment by: MarkHamTownsend (4/28/2017)

Somehow, procuring a gun and carrying it means killing? I have procured & carried --- however I have not killed anyone-THANKFULLY!!!!!!
You have a right to use as much force as necessary to stop an act of violence against you, just not MORE violence. If you're facing a mortal danger, that means you may use mortal force; a gun if you have it.
That ISN'T a "license" : IT'S THE LAW

Comment by: PHORTO (4/28/2017)

It's interesting that the author differentiates between government confiscation of arms and this incident, when that is EXACTLY what happened.

I agree that a Photoshop of a dead cop with a bullet hole in his head is provocative, and I take his point about "regular guys/gals" just following the law.

But that in no way ameliorates the fact that out of one side off his mouth he decries the suggestion that government confiscation should be met with force, and out the other he says that only when the government does this is force justified.

'Tis a puzzlement....

Comment by: -none- (4/28/2017)

"license to kill"
james bond was a fictional character that never existed, ask our military men doing hard time in leavenworth for killing terrorists against orders or strict ROE. Crime victimized citizens are prosecuted all the time when state laws (ROE) are not followed to the "t" and they shoot the perp. This writer could never be a cop or combat vet, he'd come home in a box with that passive approach "Don't fire unless fired upon".