|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Thanks, Michael Bloomberg, but No Thanks
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In case you need more bad news on your Monday, Michael Bloomberg is officially running for president. This formal announcement comes after the former New York City mayor had already registered with the Federal Election Commission and filed to appear on several states' Democratic primary ballots, so it’s not exactly a surprise. Bloomberg ran his first TV ad on Sunday, and the billionaire businessman turned political activist is expected to self-fund his campaign.
|
| Comment by:
RichardJCoon
(11/26/2019)
|
Talk about an arrogant egotistical elitist who knows what's best for the little people.....Stop and Frisk, Soda Ban, Gun Ban....
We cannot allow Mikey Bloomy to become King Mike. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
