
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NJ: Family of dog killed by Wyckoff cop hires lawyer, asks for apology
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"The Vukobratovic family has retained an attorney, continuing a campaign to put pressure on the Wyckoff Police Department after one of its officers fatally shot their dog." ...
"Broderick plans this week to file a tort claims notice, a first step toward a lawsuit. The family hasn't decided whether to sue, he said. But they have asked for an apology and for the police to admit their mistake."
"'There's a serious of concerns,' Broderick said. 'Perhaps the most important is that the story that the police gave the family was different than what the family believes and what the neighbors witnessed.'" ... |
Comment by:
jac
(5/6/2015)
|
Cops shoot dogs because they know they will get away with it. They would shoot you or I with the same recklessness if there were no consequences. |
Comment by:
jac
(5/6/2015)
|
Cops shoot dogs because they know they will get away with it. They would shoot you or I with the same recklessness if there were no consequences. |
Comment by:
teebonicus
(5/6/2015)
|
They shouldn't be allowed to DO that. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|