|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/26/2017)
|
A march or rally by people who are heavily armed is not an exercise of what the First Amendment calls the right of the people peaceably to assemble, writes Michael Dorf.
This position is problematic, and incorrect. As long as the protestors are acting peaceably, they are peaceably assembling, armed or not. At the point they use that liberty to initiate violence the right to arms is no longer protected. But until then, the Doctrine of Prior Restraint applies, and no 'interest-balancing' test can surmount the exercise of a fundamental right. No right can be denied based upon the presumption that it MAY be used to commit crimes. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so. Indeed I would go so far as to say that the underdog is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order. Adolf Hitler, April 11, 1942. (Source: "Hitler's Table-Talk at the Fuehrer's Headquarters 1941-1942", Dr. Henry Picker, ed. (Athenaeum Verlag, Bonn, 1951).) |
|
|
