|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Editorial: Lawmakers are Gun Foolish, not Gun Friendly
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Is it possible to support the people’s Second Amendment right to bear arms and also support common-sense limits on gun ownership? In the real word, most definitely. But it if you’re an Iowa legislator in 2017 and you're supporting new laws to expand access to guns, you’re not living in the real world. You’re living in a fantasy world of gun-toting, would-be heroes — the “good guys with a gun” — who honestly believe that the proliferation of guns will reduce crime and keep our streets safe for women and orphans. |
Comment by:
dasing
(2/27/2017)
|
Firearm banners are gun foolish, politicans walk the easier path! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|