|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NJ: Second Amendment group backs Andover Twp. man’s bid to carry gun
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"The [SAF] recently announced it was financially backing a township man in his fight against the state's 'justifiable need' law to carry a handgun."
"'That's actually very important because financially it will allow the case to go all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court if it is allowed to get that far,' said Israel Albert Almeida ..."
"Almeida said the foundation is fully financing his efforts."
"'This is part of our ongoing effort to have New Jersey carry laws declared unconstitutional,' said Alan Gottlieb, [SAF] founder ... 'We were drawn to Almeida's case because it provides one more example of how the Garden State's concealed carry law is simply Draconian in the way it is administered.'" ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/2/2015)
|
| its long been an axiom in "criminal-friendly" NJ permitting the arming of "high-value/profile" potential victims would impede a number of inimical economic processes. Criminals would lack funds to pay their lawyers, prosecutors and other NJS employees reliant upon its high crime rates would become superfluous and, finally, law-abiding citizens might come to feel so empowered as to start questioning some of NJ's more otre' political processes. That would never do. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
