|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
AFRet
(9/12/2016)
|
First, there is no such thing as "Gun Violence", it's called "Criminal Behavior".
Second, allowing law abiding citizens the ability to protect themselves, their loved ones, and other citizens is only common sense. |
| Comment by:
ExNuke
(9/12/2016)
|
| Denying normal people the means to protect themselves Increases the senseless violence and crime. Only a full blown Regressive can believe that choosing to be helpless and dependent makes anyone "safer". And only a Repressive who is afraid of the people who voted them into office would intentionally increase crime and violence to create a crisis to exploit. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
