|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Was the Constitutional Right to Bear Arms Designed to Protect Slavery?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In “The Second: Race and Guns in a Fatally Unequal America,” the historian Carol Anderson argues that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which provides for a “well regulated militia” and “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” offers “a particularly maddening set of double standards where race is concerned.” On the one hand, she claims that slaveholding founding fathers insisted on the inclusion of the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights in order to assure themselves of a fighting force willing to suppress slave insurrections. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(5/28/2021)
|
Critical Race Theory BULLSHIT.
Read what The Founders wrote in THE FEDERALIST PAPERS or some of their contemporary writings.
This IS NOT ignorance on the the part of Carol Anderson. This is a deliberate attempt to rewrite our country's history, traditikn, and the Constitution & Bill of Rights.
It's what Marxists do. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/28/2021)
|
A useless article about a useless book.
The Overton Window re blacks lawfully exercising their 2A rights is moving - TOWARD INCLUSION.
As it should be, and it is long overdue. But I would point out that it's changing because peaceable blacks are finally waking up and joining the ranks of the legally-armed.
Nobody I know objects to peaceable people, no matter what their race, religion or ethnicity, going armed in this country.
Ideology, however, is a different story. Those who would strip the people of their heritage of American First Principles based upon political ideology should be shunned, ostracized and eliminated from the American democratic process. Attacking and undermining the Declaration and Bill of Rights is treason. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
