|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
As Moms gather in Olympia, MoveOn.org launches library gun ban effort
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"In the wake of yesterday’s hearings on several bills containing exemptions to Initiative 594, the Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America (MDA) lobbying group gathered today in Olympia to push for more gun restrictions, while MoveOn.org launched a petition drive in an attempt to push the Washington Legislature to change state law and ban firearms in public libraries."
“'The only way to keep firearms out of Washington public libraries is to change the state law,' the on-line petition appeal states. 'Time to do it. Time to amend RCW 9.41.300 and add public libraries to the list of institutions where guns are banned!" ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(2/11/2015)
|
| Why not have yet another "gun free zone", or rather a "free kill" zone to tempt the homicidal, or terroristic ? I suspect these "moms" completely miss the irony inherent in their good intentions. Without guns - and the willingness to use them - its likely there wouldn't be libraries; or any other institutions and edifices dedicated to preservation of history and learning. Now if these "moms" had just availed themselves of the opportunity ...... |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
