|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI: Company Offering Free Armed Security to Some Michigan School Districts
Submitted by:
Corey Salo
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
More than a dozen school districts in Southeast Michigan have been offered two free months of service by armed and unarmed officers as part of a Michigan security company's initiative to keep students safe.
Flint-based DM Burr Group has launched Operation S.O.S, or Secure Our Schools, following the Feb. 14 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida that left 14 students and three staff members dead.
John Allen, the chief executive officer of DM Burr, said the company has already spoken to several districts in Genesee, Oakland and Livingston counties about the opportunity.
|
| Comment by:
netsyscon
(3/7/2018)
|
| Will be interesting if there are any takers. More interesting will be the law suits against the school districts when they turn down the service and then something happens |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
