|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MD: Organizers take to Lawyers Mall in Annapolis to demand gun reform
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Moms Rising and Marylanders to Prevent Gun Violence organized a rally at Lawyers Mall in Annapolis on Wednesday with specific demands for change.
They want a ban on bump stocks, funding for evidence-based gun violence prevention programs, opposition to a bill that would allow people to use self-defense as a reason to carry, handgun permit reviews taken out of the hands of the handgun permit review board and put into the hands of judges and several other tougher gun laws. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/15/2018)
|
Who CARES what they think?
They need to shut up and go away. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(3/16/2018)
|
| This from people who know ABSOUTLY NOTHING about firearms and the law!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
