|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CA: Eliminate all guns
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Second Amendment is outdated and was enacted for the purpose of using militia forces to quell uprisings. We as a country do not require the Second Amendment to protect us anymore.
The big question is, how do we achieve the elimination of all guns with the exception of law enforcement and armed services personnel? Congress could declare a month for the giving up of all firearms. They could be deposited at police stations and other government offices, and those who don't comply would be heavily fined and face jail time. |
Comment by:
shootergdv
(10/17/2017)
|
Confiscation of private property, huh. Some collectors have spent a lifetime accumulating arms. Others collect knives, cars, motorcycles, all have or can be used in crimes. Yup, I'll willingly drop off my guns at the PD, right after Jay Leno turns in all his cars ahead of me. |
Comment by:
GR8dowbay
(10/18/2017)
|
** SURE ...BAD GUYS FIRST! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|