
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
VA: Gun fans, take second look at Second Amendment
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"Rudy DiGiacinto's opposition to some of my statements about the Second Amendment led me to his Web site, which proved to be a valuable history of the militia in Virginia from Colonial times ['Founders defined 'militia' as the people, and wanted them packing,' Jan. 28]."
"Certainly, a militiaman had to be armed. But the Second Amendment did not dictate who should own the weapon that he carried."
"After independence, when militia figures were reported from each state, there were wide variations in the percentage of militiamen bringing their own weapons when called to duty." ... -------
Submitter's Note: But according to the infamous Miller decision: "... ordinarily when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time." |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Some writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins ... Society is in every state a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one. — THOMAS PAINE |
|
|