|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
RangerJEB
(2/15/2019)
|
This is a very good opinion piece I would like to share via Facebook and email but I see no easy way to do this.
|
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(2/15/2019)
|
| Illogical and delusional. It's the criminals. Depriving the rights of law abiding folks will not justify the inability to control criminals. Just more feel good. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/15/2019)
|
"[W]hen an intruder comes through your door and your self defense weapon is inside a locked storage container; has a trigger lock on it; and the ammunition is, by law, stored in a separate locked container, the use of that gun for immediate self defense and protection of your property is totally denied to you."
It's already been held unconstitutional, so how can these yahoos continue to defy the law with impunity?
“Held:
“3) …the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional.” - D.C. v. Heller (2008) |
| Comment by:
lbauer
(2/15/2019)
|
RangerJEB
Just copy the header at the top of your browser.
You can then send it via e-mail or post in FaceBook and it will serve as a link to take anyone straight to the article.
https://ctmirror.org/category/ct-viewpoints/we-dont-need-more-gun-laws-that-dont-work/ |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
