|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
To Build a Case for Guns in Public, a Judge Cited Racist Antebellum Legal Precedents
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The decision was authored by Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain, a Reagan appointee, who argues that courts cannot consider the implications of gun laws on public safety, but instead must limit themselves to evaluating a given firearm restriction against the text of the Constitution, legal tradition, and other historical evidence. Then O’Scannlain turns to such precedent — some of which is dubious at best.
Namely, the judge cites a set of gun cases from the antebellum South, when the meaning of armed self defense in public was inseparable from a culture of dueling and fear of slave revolts. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/27/2018)
|
Memo to The Trace:
Stick a fork in yourself, you're done.
It's only a matter of time. Right now this ruling only affects the Western states and Hawaii - if the en banc 9th Circuit Court reverses, it will go to the SCOTUS where it will be upheld, thence to apply to the whole country.
Your meat's cooked. Would you like some potatoes to go with it? |
| Comment by:
mickey
(7/27/2018)
|
These newslinks should come with a warning. Instead of opening with a state's abbreviation, they should start with "MediaMatters:" or "TheTrace:"
Anyway, if an 1800s decision which said that freed slaves had a right to carry openly but no right to carry concealed is too "racist" for The Trace, I assume The Trace believes that all citizens have the right to carry concealed and openly? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
