|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
NotPrey
(6/15/2016)
|
| Not any "facts" at all, just hysterical emotional regurgitation of proven lies espoused by the Violence Policy Center. |
| Comment by:
jac
(6/15/2016)
|
Another idiot that subscribes to the notion that defensive gun uses only count if someone is killed.
I can guarantee that quite a few people at the Orlando night club would have been happy to have someone with a gun able to defend them against the Moslem murderer.
That not one of the 300 patrons had a gun only speaks to the mindset of the good guys with a gun permit. I guarantee that some of the people there had carry permits, but not one of them was willing to carry a gun into an establishment serving alcohol in violation of the law.
As a result, the only person with a gun was the murderer. |
| Comment by:
jac
(6/15/2016)
|
Another idiot that subscribes to the notion that defensive gun uses don't count unless someone is killed.
I can guarantee you that the people in the Orlando night club would have been very happy to have a good guy with a gun to defend themselves against the muslim murderer.
That no one had a gun only speaks to the mindset of the law abiding citizens. I can pretty much guarantee that there were licensed concealed carriers among the 300 attendees at the night club, but not one of them was willing to carry a gun into an establishment serving alcohol in violation of Florida law.
It should be obvious, even to idiots, that the law abiding gun owners are not the problem. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
