|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
lbauer
(6/5/2015)
|
Classic case of misinterpreting statements made, and using their own biased surveys and false statements to attempt to refute the simple facts stated by Vaughn and Fox.
Their desperation and panic is almost palpable. |
| Comment by:
RapidRobert
(6/5/2015)
|
Started to peruse the "article". It just didn't "feel right". So I started over at the top: Media Matters, quoting Mother Jones, David Hemenway, Harvard Injury Control... ad nauseum. No wonder their conclusions sounded familiar.
Now I'm only surprised that guns in China were not found to elevate American inner city homicide rates among dwarves with a short left leg.
Bah!
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
