|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
GA: Militia group's numbers grow in wake of election of President Trump
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A militia billing itself as a security force is vowing to protect the Second Amendment. The Three Percent Security force, named after those who fought in the American revolution (It's said - only three percent of the colonists fought against the king's tyranny) says they're preparing to "uphold and defend the constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic." They train like a military, "basic infantry man skills, everything from communications to combat lifesaving medical first aid." Founded in Henry County, the group started out as an anti- President Barack Obama group, before openly supporting President Donald Trump's run for President. ... The group said they'll vow to protect the Second Amendment, even under Trump. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(2/24/2017)
|
I strongly respect those who form or serve in militias when the purpose is to defend the U.S. Constitution and esp. the Second Amendment. However, in truth I cannot say I believe President trump is any danger to the 2A. His sons are gun owners, hunters, and IMHO, have shown their father the light on the 2A. If Hillary Clintoon had won, the matter would be entirely different ---- and we may yet face her kind again in the future!!!! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|