|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
dasing
(5/10/2017)
|
| Note: former judge, he belives anyone in front of a judge is guilty, hands down!!! |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/10/2017)
|
More Chicken Little nonsense.
The very idea that "clear and convincing evidence" should not be necessary to bind a person over for trial is inherently elitist and tyrannical.
I doper commits felony armed robbery and shoots someone. The facts on the ground are that he WAS involved, in flagrante delicto. He claims SYG immunity, saying he was 'defending' himself.
Do you mean to tell me that any judge, under the 'revised' SYG law, would GRANT such a dirtball immunity from prosecution?
Pu-LEEZE. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| ...If a man lies under oath or procures the lie of another under oath, if he perjures himself or suborns perjury, he is guilty under the statute law. Under the higher law, under the great law of morality and righteousness, he is precisely as guilty if, instead of lying in a court, he lies in a newspaper or on the stump; and in all probability, the evil effects of his conduct are infinitely more widespread and more pernicious. — Teddy Roosevelt - May 12, 1900 |
|
|
