|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: Brevard County Stand Your Ground case shows changes to the law must be undone
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It’s understandable that Sheriff Wayne Ivey is unhappy with the 5th District Court of Appeals’ ruling dismissing charges against John DeRossett, accused of shooting a Brevard County deputy during a botched arrest in 2015. I’d feel the same in his position.
Like Ivey, I also support the Stand-Your-Ground law — its original version and part of the current version. The District Court reached the only decision it could under the current statute. Under the original one, the court may have reached a different result. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/23/2020)
|
Disagree.
When fundamental rights are in the balance, the burden is ALWAYS on the state to present clear and convincing evidence sufficient to merit a charge. At trial, the burden is on the state to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
This is as it should be, compelling the state to act pursuant to the presumption of innocence.
The amendment didn't bollix the law, it repaired it. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|
