|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
IA: 10 Year Old Killed by Accidental Airgun Shooting At Firing Range
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In Garner, Iowa, a young boy has died after an apparently accidental shooting at a firing range.
Police say in a news release that the 10 year old, of Clear Lake, suffered a head wound Sunday afternoon from a pellet gun at the Garner shooting range.
The Garner City Administrator said Wednesday that the boy and a younger brother went to the range with their grandfather. He said exactly what occurred at the range Sunday remains unclear, but no charges are expected to be filed. |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(9/15/2016)
|
| Not enough can be said for gun safety training. The antis say they want to promote gun safety but would block any attempt to have Eddie Eagle come in to give an assembly. Recently, 1 brother shot his other brother who just bought a new 'bullet proof vest.' Brother 1 pondered, "Wonder if it really works?" Brother 2 said, "Let's see, and shot him," resulting in death. How many layers of redundant safety did bro 2 violate? A speck of any real 'gun safety' could've prevented that. There's blood on the hands of the anti's who won't accept there's a gun culture and a need for prudent gun safety awareness. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
