|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
Sosalty
(10/3/2016)
|
"Intended meaning of 1st A lost in America today." OK, you can express your opinion, but 1st you should pass a mental test along with being literate as to economics and the working of our political system. |
Comment by:
mickey
(10/3/2016)
|
Sometimes I think the purpose of Letters to the Editor is to prove that the readers are even dumber than the Authorized Journalists. |
Comment by:
dasing
(10/4/2016)
|
A forced mental requriment IS infrignment ! |
Comment by:
dasing
(10/4/2016)
|
A forced mental requriment IS infrignment ! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|