|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/16/2020)
|
Baloney. Reduced to its essence, the sentence can be accurately represented thus:
"Because of that, we are guaranteeing this." "That" does not equal "this." They are two different things. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(4/16/2020)
|
"Absolute phrase???"
Huh?
The "well regulated militia" part is an "exemplar."
That it might be interpreted to protect the right of a state to maintain a militia, does nothing to change the fact that the second part, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed," was absolutly intended to do EXACTLY AS THE PHRASE DIRECTLY STATES.
The guy is a "grammarian?" Really?
I'm sorry, the guy hasn't much of a clue. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/16/2020)
|
MarkHamTownsend -
He's a "grammarian" with an anti-gun agenda.
His methodology is a dead giveaway.
Thomas Jefferson explained to Supreme Court Justice William Johnson, June 12, 1823: “On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.”
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
