|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
ME: Citizens shouldn't own military-grade weapons
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
But how in hell’s creation does one morally justify letting a private citizen own a military-grade weapon such as an AR-15 for the purpose of pleasure or hunting? They were made for one purpose: to kill people.
I agree that we must learn ways to eliminate senseless killings. And the first step is to realize that our forefathers never envisioned such firepower from a single weapon having the ability to kill mass numbers of our innocent citizens. I would like to think that if they were clairvoyant, the Second Amendment would have been reworded to define “reasonable” arms. |
Comment by:
dasing
(10/17/2017)
|
If SOME people would learn, not just the Bill of Rights, but how they were debated and finally formed they would shut up and let more learned people talk !!!! |
Comment by:
GR8dowbay
(10/18/2017)
|
U MEAN?? ..I HV TO GIVE UP MY M60 BELT-FED?!! Dammmm...
{CA. POLIITICIANS. a PRETTY SICK BUNCH a LIB-SOCIALISTS! DANGEROUS, IN FACT!} |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|