|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CA: California gun fee upheld over NRA objections
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
But the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco said Thursday that the surcharge imposed a “minimal burden,” at most, on gun ownership rights, and was properly limited to programs aimed at reducing gun crimes.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court has approved bans on gun ownership by felons and the mentally ill, “we have recognized that public safety is advanced by keeping guns out of the hands of people who are most likely to misuse them for these reasons,” Chief Judge Sidney Thomas said in the 3-0 ruling, upholding a lower-court decision.
And while the state may not tax constitutionally protected activities to increase general revenue, Thomas said the California fee supports only programs related to gun sales and public safety. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(6/2/2017)
|
| Any tax on a right IS unconstitutional no matter what it is for! |
| Comment by:
dasing
(6/2/2017)
|
| The anti-american ninth court should be disbandeb! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
