|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Can We Please Stop Celebrating Domestic Terrorists?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
On August 25th, two men who were protesting the police shooting of Jacob Blake were shot and killed by a 17 year old with a rifle. The incident is still under investigation, but several chilling cell phone videos exist that document the situation (The video is disturbing, use viewer discretion, here is the link).
No matter how the investigation turns out, one thing is clear: we can’t have this. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/4/2020)
|
"Domestic terrorists?"
Pardon, but when these guys were shot, they weren't 'protesting,' they were ATTACKING this kid.
The videos clearly show that.
And yes, we CAN have this, and we will undoubtedly have it again if these violent thugs persist in their insurrectionist rampages. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
