
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
IN: Nation in dire need of uniform gun control
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Licensing and registration of all guns is an important first step. And as with the licensing of drivers and registration of automobiles, there must be certification that the owner of the device has some simple understanding of the use of the gun and how to store it safely.
I am suggesting a qualified person test an individual to determine the person has the ability to use the weapon in a safe manner and that written testing shows the person knows the rules for safe storage of the weapon.
And there must be a waiting period until the gun is registered, and the person is licensed to own the weapon. It is also prudent that the proposed owner of a gun undergo a background check. |
Comment by:
lbauer
(1/16/2016)
|
Typical screed. Oh, I've always been around guns and really like them, but now we have to get rid of them. Perpetuates the believe of the ignorant that a Chicago criminal can just cross the state line and legally buy a gun in Indiana. Of course as is increasingly the case, the article does not allow for any comment. If it did I guarantee the author would get ripped to shreds. |
Comment by:
laker1
(1/16/2016)
|
Well, it should be a self evident truth that if guns are so easy to get in Indiana, Indiana should have a violent crime rate comparable to Chicago. That of course is the fallacy of the brain dead logic. Indiana has a far, far, lower violent crime rate than Illinois. |
Comment by:
jac
(1/16/2016)
|
These idiots assume that in the absence of guns, crime and murder will go down.
Actually, in all likelihood crime will increase in the high crime areas. There won't be anything for the thugs to fear. They don't fear the police or the judicial system. The only thing they fear is running into someone with a gun.
The murder rate might go down some because you will not have the drive by shootings and bystanders getting shot, but you will have an increase in dead robbery victims.
|
Comment by:
jac
(1/16/2016)
|
(Continued from above)
The problem is not the availability of guns. The problem is a culture that has no values or respect for anything including human life. Most of them already have criminal records and have gotten expert at gamming the judicial system. One program that would work at reducing crime would be to lock them up, but the government does not have the fortitude to come up with the resources to do so. Unfortunately the liberal judicial system abets the problem by placing restrictions on inmate treatment in prison that adds to the cost of incarceration. As far as I am concerned, if you can shove them in and still close the door, the prison isn't full yet. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|