|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(4/16/2021)
|
There is no such thing as common sense gun laws.
All of these proposals will only affect law abiding citizens and won't to anything to reduce violence and criminal use of firearms.
The people proposing and supporting this legislation are sick. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(4/16/2021)
|
| Go to the effort of leaving a civil comment on this extremely biased article. They're using "DISQUS" and they moderate all posts (eyeroll). One mindless and illogical anti gun post got through. Flood them with civil comments and make them moderate intelligent posts. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/16/2021)
|
All one has to do is to recognize the names of these two miscreants, and reading the article becomes non-essential.
They are anti-Constitution statists, so, what's the point?
Everything, EVERYTHING they stand for is counterfeit. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
