|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MD: Maryland Sued Over ‘Glock Ban’ in Federal Court
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Gun rights groups filed a federal Second Amendment lawsuit immediately following the signing of Maryland’s “Glock ban” this week.
The state’s new ban criminalizes the future sale, purchase, or transfer of Glock handguns and similar semiautomatic pistols, which the state argues could potentially be converted illicitly to fire fully automatic due to the common cruciform trigger bars.
California and Connecticut used similar pretexts to pass parallel laws recently, despite the fact that Glock’s popular and safe design has been around for nearly half a century. California immediately caught its own federal lawsuit for the effort. |
| Comment by:
jimobxpelham
(5/29/2026)
|
| Gov signed the bill, he should have to pay out of pocket to defend it. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
