|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/8/2018)
|
Comparing us to the Swiss, or Germans, or French, or Canadians, or Brits is like comparing protein to carbohydrates.
Yes, they are both foods, but that's where the similarity ends.
I really wish 'good-intentioned' people would quit this ridiculous exercise.
We are not anyone else - we are AMERICANS. |
| Comment by:
gariders
(3/8/2018)
|
| Once each year our government should provide us with free ammo to train with and remain proficient with our weapons. Oh yea, can I have an m-16 that I used while in the military. (would really rather have my M-14, but I don't believe they would let me have either). I would lock them up in one of my gun safes. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
